<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: More Neo-Con Military Advice</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lobelog.com/more-neo-con-military-advice/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lobelog.com/more-neo-con-military-advice/</link>
	<description>Personality Blogs</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri,  3 Sep 2010 22:28:30 +0100</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://www.lobelog.com/more-neo-con-military-advice/comment-page-1/#comment-6717</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Feb 2008 20:12:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ips.org/blog/jimlobe/?p=99#comment-6717</guid>
		<description>A thought for Dsmith and radii:
     The neoconservatives are less &quot;pro-Israel&quot; than pro-Likud.  Their views match those of the Likud minority of Israelis who favor Israeli territorial expansion, oppose a two-state solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, and hope for a U.S. war on Iran.  These hard-line Likud policies threaten both U.S. and Israeli national security.
     A U.S. policy of defending Israel within its 1967 borders is fine.  But we should reject pro-Likud policies as contrary to American values and U.S. security.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A thought for Dsmith and radii:<br />
     The neoconservatives are less &#8220;pro-Israel&#8221; than pro-Likud.  Their views match those of the Likud minority of Israelis who favor Israeli territorial expansion, oppose a two-state solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, and hope for a U.S. war on Iran.  These hard-line Likud policies threaten both U.S. and Israeli national security.<br />
     A U.S. policy of defending Israel within its 1967 borders is fine.  But we should reject pro-Likud policies as contrary to American values and U.S. security.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric</title>
		<link>http://www.lobelog.com/more-neo-con-military-advice/comment-page-1/#comment-6442</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 05:30:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ips.org/blog/jimlobe/?p=99#comment-6442</guid>
		<description>The greatest threat to the US is @ 1600 Pennsylvania Ave. men elected to lead instead pursuing power over not just the citizenry of this country but the world.  Is it me or was this the reason we fought the cold war to stop a conspiracy of global domination.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The greatest threat to the US is @ 1600 Pennsylvania Ave. men elected to lead instead pursuing power over not just the citizenry of this country but the world.  Is it me or was this the reason we fought the cold war to stop a conspiracy of global domination.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reed Richards</title>
		<link>http://www.lobelog.com/more-neo-con-military-advice/comment-page-1/#comment-6430</link>
		<dc:creator>Reed Richards</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 02:14:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ips.org/blog/jimlobe/?p=99#comment-6430</guid>
		<description>radii, patrick, Dsmith,  Matthew Moriarty,  Ralph, Gene,

Why stop there at the children and relatives of the neo-con fanatics?  Anyone who has the strength of mouth to make the clarion call for and spout the platitudes to support war should have the strength of body and spirit to fight the war.  In other words, they should enlist or shut the hell up.  I don&#039;t care if you are collecting social security benefits.

Having said that, I don&#039;t blame the neo-con fascists or their war mongering enables in the war party, (Dems or Repubs it doesn&#039;t matter) because at the end of the day, when the smoke clears and the dust settles, the American people always vote for a never-ending state of war................</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>radii, patrick, Dsmith,  Matthew Moriarty,  Ralph, Gene,</p>
<p>Why stop there at the children and relatives of the neo-con fanatics?  Anyone who has the strength of mouth to make the clarion call for and spout the platitudes to support war should have the strength of body and spirit to fight the war.  In other words, they should enlist or shut the hell up.  I don&#8217;t care if you are collecting social security benefits.</p>
<p>Having said that, I don&#8217;t blame the neo-con fascists or their war mongering enables in the war party, (Dems or Repubs it doesn&#8217;t matter) because at the end of the day, when the smoke clears and the dust settles, the American people always vote for a never-ending state of war&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: radii</title>
		<link>http://www.lobelog.com/more-neo-con-military-advice/comment-page-1/#comment-6411</link>
		<dc:creator>radii</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 20:32:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ips.org/blog/jimlobe/?p=99#comment-6411</guid>
		<description>Am I alone in thinking that it is Israel which is the greatest threat to America?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Am I alone in thinking that it is Israel which is the greatest threat to America?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: patrick</title>
		<link>http://www.lobelog.com/more-neo-con-military-advice/comment-page-1/#comment-6403</link>
		<dc:creator>patrick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 18:20:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ips.org/blog/jimlobe/?p=99#comment-6403</guid>
		<description>Ralph, I&#039;ve read that Michael Ledeen and Eliot Cohen have sons that serve as Marine Corps officers.  

I know that this is not enough.  The whole Kagan, Kristol, Bush, Cheney, Gaffney, and Podhoretz clans should be marching through the streets of Mosul spreading democracy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ralph, I&#8217;ve read that Michael Ledeen and Eliot Cohen have sons that serve as Marine Corps officers.  </p>
<p>I know that this is not enough.  The whole Kagan, Kristol, Bush, Cheney, Gaffney, and Podhoretz clans should be marching through the streets of Mosul spreading democracy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dsmith</title>
		<link>http://www.lobelog.com/more-neo-con-military-advice/comment-page-1/#comment-6394</link>
		<dc:creator>Dsmith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 13:02:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ips.org/blog/jimlobe/?p=99#comment-6394</guid>
		<description>I wish every American, hell even half, knew how the Israeli-first crowd manipulates our foreign policy. WAR! WAR! WAR! as long as they don&#039;t have to fight in it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wish every American, hell even half, knew how the Israeli-first crowd manipulates our foreign policy. WAR! WAR! WAR! as long as they don&#8217;t have to fight in it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew Moriarty</title>
		<link>http://www.lobelog.com/more-neo-con-military-advice/comment-page-1/#comment-6389</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Moriarty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 11:54:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ips.org/blog/jimlobe/?p=99#comment-6389</guid>
		<description>What a fool is Petraeus. Always ready to serve Israel though. No matter the USS Liberty. But our troops are overextended, exhausted and demoralized and increasingly mindful they are sitting ducks if the idiot &#039;Decider&#039; launches a war against Iran.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What a fool is Petraeus. Always ready to serve Israel though. No matter the USS Liberty. But our troops are overextended, exhausted and demoralized and increasingly mindful they are sitting ducks if the idiot &#8216;Decider&#8217; launches a war against Iran.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ralph McGaughey</title>
		<link>http://www.lobelog.com/more-neo-con-military-advice/comment-page-1/#comment-6386</link>
		<dc:creator>Ralph McGaughey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 11:12:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ips.org/blog/jimlobe/?p=99#comment-6386</guid>
		<description>Darn, you made me breach my one man boycott of Max Boot by quoting the foreign born coward. He touts the war. He is young enough to fight it. He should enlist or shut up. 

Does anyone know of a single prominent neocon or a close relative of same who has ever deigned to don an American uniform?

Thanks for the heads up anyway.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Darn, you made me breach my one man boycott of Max Boot by quoting the foreign born coward. He touts the war. He is young enough to fight it. He should enlist or shut up. </p>
<p>Does anyone know of a single prominent neocon or a close relative of same who has ever deigned to don an American uniform?</p>
<p>Thanks for the heads up anyway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gene</title>
		<link>http://www.lobelog.com/more-neo-con-military-advice/comment-page-1/#comment-6327</link>
		<dc:creator>Gene</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2008 08:43:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ips.org/blog/jimlobe/?p=99#comment-6327</guid>
		<description>In light of that, is it possible that Petraeus is dissembling &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ips.org/blog/jimlobe/?p=92&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;? He may be already taking the necessary measures to appear less &#039;hawkish&#039; in case he is called upon to replace Fallon. I would guess that he would have a better chance of being accepted by the &#039;realist&#039; faction in Congress if he is not viewed as a hawk when it comes to Iran.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In light of that, is it possible that Petraeus is dissembling <a href="http://www.ips.org/blog/jimlobe/?p=92" rel="nofollow">here</a>? He may be already taking the necessary measures to appear less &#8216;hawkish&#8217; in case he is called upon to replace Fallon. I would guess that he would have a better chance of being accepted by the &#8216;realist&#8217; faction in Congress if he is not viewed as a hawk when it comes to Iran.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
