Really, does self-deceipt fit your tastes?? I guess it does.

Those who debase the term “antisemite” make it harder to fight real antisemitism, as evils with no name are much harder to resist. Shame on the neocons for making the world safer for real antisemites.

Good insight.

Since few individual gentiles in their right mind would enter into this debate, anyone who putatively slips over some invisible line (such as Sullivan or even Limbaugh) is a gift to the lobby — someone who will be made to stand as proof of the ostensibly incurable anti-Jewish bigotry of the entire non-Jewish world.

In sum, this projection of antisemitism onto gentile culture is a refusal to accept the traumatic loss of victim status. As Yoav Shamir’s film *Defamation* makes clear, it requires an elaborate program of psychological violence to convince Israeli teenagers to embrace victimhood. This is, of course, child abuse, but the very fact that victim identity must be forced onto new generations of Jews is also evidence that the end of the crisis is on the horizon. Until that end comes, we can all expect to be accused of antisemitism; it’s not a big deal anymore. Which is too bad for REAL antisemitism, as it does exist and requires monitoring.

If we can’t get it together to resist these creatures they will win, just like their spiritual forebears won in 1930’s Germany. What are we missing? Have we lost confidence in the faith of our core convictions?

It’s up to us, People. No amount of whining and kvetching will hold back the onslaught of the jackboot hordes. Only a grim, coordinated, concerted strategy formulated in a social-military format with special emphasis on psy-ops.

Remember, the Bible says there are two kinds of people: liberals and churls. It’s time the liberals began naming the screaming riff-raff for what they are — CHURLS! (Isaiah 32:5) Sing it loud! Sing it proud! Sing it from the mountaintop. Right-wing jackboots are churls and the Bible thinks so too!

Leon Wieseltier and his Zionist fellow travelers understood that from the get-go. That’s why it was always imperative that both opinion- and decision-makers be totally discouraged from venturing into no-go areas, such as admitting there even was such a thing as a “Jewish lobby” – let alone that it wielded great power, often against the best interests of US citizens.

In his novel, Orwell described sex as being a political act; in Washington, simple two-plus-two logic, admitting to the evidence of what is hiding in plain sight, has been turned into a political act by the Jewish lobby.