<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Heilbrunn Reviews Neo-Con Travails</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lobelog.com/heilbrunn-reviews-neo-con-travails/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lobelog.com/heilbrunn-reviews-neo-con-travails/</link>
	<description>Personality Blogs</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 05:25:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: scott</title>
		<link>http://www.lobelog.com/heilbrunn-reviews-neo-con-travails/comment-page-1/#comment-37522</link>
		<dc:creator>scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Jan 2009 14:31:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ips.org/blog/jimlobe/?p=212#comment-37522</guid>
		<description>Danielle Pletka is certainly a neo-con, though she was a more effective spokesperson than the other you mentioned who are really creepy.  Pipes looks like the devil incarnate, if the archetype found in scores of cartoons is a guide.  This is not a defense of Pletka who has no qualm spreading lies and disinformation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Danielle Pletka is certainly a neo-con, though she was a more effective spokesperson than the other you mentioned who are really creepy.  Pipes looks like the devil incarnate, if the archetype found in scores of cartoons is a guide.  This is not a defense of Pletka who has no qualm spreading lies and disinformation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carroll</title>
		<link>http://www.lobelog.com/heilbrunn-reviews-neo-con-travails/comment-page-1/#comment-37489</link>
		<dc:creator>Carroll</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Jan 2009 01:16:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ips.org/blog/jimlobe/?p=212#comment-37489</guid>
		<description>I would say there is a great pretense of cleaning up-AEI.

In  particular I would never believe that was Danielle Pletka&#039;s doing.

They are just being shifted to another room and out of public sight.
They aren&#039;t gone.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would say there is a great pretense of cleaning up-AEI.</p>
<p>In  particular I would never believe that was Danielle Pletka&#8217;s doing.</p>
<p>They are just being shifted to another room and out of public sight.<br />
They aren&#8217;t gone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon Harrison</title>
		<link>http://www.lobelog.com/heilbrunn-reviews-neo-con-travails/comment-page-1/#comment-37487</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon Harrison</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jan 2009 23:37:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ips.org/blog/jimlobe/?p=212#comment-37487</guid>
		<description>Danielle Pletka leading a purge of neocons at AEI? Does not compute in this corner, either. There&#039;s got to be something else going on over there.

Will Obama prove a liberal interventionist? I see him walking a very fine line through the first term. He&#039;s a canny guy, already looking to his re-election. The selection of Hillary was more about (if I may be indelicate) having her inside the tent pissing out, as opposed to the reverse. The question is: can he control not simply the agenda, but his own appointees? I have my doubts. It will be interesting to watch. The Left is going to be increasingly unhappy with this administration, but it has nowhere to go - unless, of course, it wants to render itself completely irrelevant.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Danielle Pletka leading a purge of neocons at AEI? Does not compute in this corner, either. There&#8217;s got to be something else going on over there.</p>
<p>Will Obama prove a liberal interventionist? I see him walking a very fine line through the first term. He&#8217;s a canny guy, already looking to his re-election. The selection of Hillary was more about (if I may be indelicate) having her inside the tent pissing out, as opposed to the reverse. The question is: can he control not simply the agenda, but his own appointees? I have my doubts. It will be interesting to watch. The Left is going to be increasingly unhappy with this administration, but it has nowhere to go &#8211; unless, of course, it wants to render itself completely irrelevant.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

