If you haven’t seen it already, here is Chas Freeman’s statement on the withdrawal of his appointment as chairman of the National Intelligence Council (NIC):
To all who supported me or gave me words of encouragement during the controversy of the past two weeks, you have my gratitude and respect.
You will by now have seen the statement by Director of National Intelligence Dennis Blair reporting that I have withdrawn my previous acceptance of his invitation to chair the National Intelligence Council.
I have concluded that the barrage of libelous distortions of my record would not cease upon my entry into office. The effort to smear me and to destroy my credibility would instead continue. I do not believe the National Intelligence Council could function effectively while its chair was under constant attack by unscrupulous people with a passionate attachment to the views of a political faction in a foreign country. I agreed to chair the NIC to strengthen it and protect it against politicization, not to introduce it to efforts by a special interest group to assert control over it through a protracted political campaign.
As those who know me are well aware, I have greatly enjoyed life since retiring from government. Nothing was further from my mind than a return to public service. When Admiral Blair asked me to chair the NIC I responded that I understood he was “asking me to give my freedom of speech, my leisure, the greater part of my income, subject myself to the mental colonoscopy of a polygraph, and resume a daily commute to a job with long working hours and a daily ration of political abuse.” I added that I wondered “whether there wasn’t some sort of downside to this offer.” I was mindful that no one is indispensable; I am not an exception. It took weeks of reflection for me to conclude that, given the unprecedentedly challenging circumstances in which our country now finds itself abroad and at home, I had no choice but accept the call to return to public service. I thereupon resigned from all positions that I had held and all activities in which I was engaged. I now look forward to returning to private life, freed of all previous obligations.
I am not so immodest as to believe that this controversy was about me rather than issues of public policy. These issues had little to do with the NIC and were not at the heart of what I hoped to contribute to the quality of analysis available to President Obama and his administration. Still, I am saddened by what the controversy and the manner in which the public vitriol of those who devoted themselves to sustaining it have revealed about the state of our civil society. It is apparent that we Americans cannot any longer conduct a serious public discussion or exercise independent judgment about matters of great importance to our country as well as to our allies and friends.
The libels on me and their easily traceable email trails show conclusively that there is a powerful lobby determined to prevent any view other than its own from being aired, still less to factor in American understanding of trends and events in the Middle East. The tactics of the Israel Lobby plumb the depths of dishonor and indecency and include character assassination, selective misquotation, the willful distortion of the record, the fabrication of falsehoods, and an utter disregard for the truth. The aim of this Lobby is control of the policy process through the exercise of a veto over the appointment of people who dispute the wisdom of its views, the substitution of political correctness for analysis, and the exclusion of any and all options for decision by Americans and our government other than those that it favors.
There is a special irony in having been accused of improper regard for the opinions of foreign governments and societies by a group so clearly intent on enforcing adherence to the policies of a foreign government – in this case, the government of Israel. I believe that the inability of the American public to discuss, or the government to consider, any option for US policies in the Middle East opposed by the ruling faction in Israeli politics has allowed that faction to adopt and sustain policies that ultimately threaten the existence of the state of Israel. It is not permitted for anyone in the United States to say so. This is not just a tragedy for Israelis and their neighbors in the Middle East; it is doing widening damage to the national security of the United States.
The outrageous agitation that followed the leak of my pending appointment will be seen by many to raise serious questions about whether the Obama administration will be able to make its own decisions about the Middle East and related issues. I regret that my willingness to serve the new administration has ended by casting doubt on its ability to consider, let alone decide what policies might best serve the interests of the United States rather than those of a Lobby intent on enforcing the will and interests of a foreign government.
In the court of public opinion, unlike a court of law, one is guilty until proven innocent. The speeches from which quotations have been lifted from their context are available for anyone interested in the truth to read. The injustice of the accusations made against me has been obvious to those with open minds. Those who have sought to impugn my character are uninterested in any rebuttal that I or anyone else might make.
Still, for the record: I have never sought to be paid or accepted payment from any foreign government, including Saudi Arabia or China, for any service, nor have I ever spoken on behalf of a foreign government, its interests, or its policies. I have never lobbied any branch of our government for any cause, foreign or domestic. I am my own man, no one else’s, and with my return to private life, I will once again – to my pleasure – serve no master other than myself. I will continue to speak out as I choose on issues of concern to me and other Americans.
I retain my respect and confidence in President Obama and DNI Blair. Our country now faces terrible challenges abroad as well as at home. Like all patriotic Americans, I continue to pray that our president can successfully lead us in surmounting them.
Mike
March 10, 2009 @ 11:16 pm
In a matter of a month two key appointments (one Anthony Zinni and now Chas Freeman) have been torpedoed by the Israeli lobby.
I fear for America.
Jon Harrison
March 11, 2009 @ 8:10 am
Mr. Freeman’s statement says it all. This matter deserves far more attention than it has received. It has been reported to a minimal extent; the average American has not heard a word about it. Yet we have incessant coverage of so many relatively unimportant events.
There are two issues here. The first was raised by Freeman in his statement: U.S. policy is being manipulated by certain people who place Israel’s interests before those of the United States. This should be brought to the attention of the American people by the American media – but as usual when it comes to Israel, our media sees, hears and speaks no evil. This site is one of a few devoted to a unbiased examination of the facts. Unfortunately, the reach of this and other like-minded sites cannot compare to that of the media outlets sympathetic to the Lobby.
The second issue I find even more disturbing. Actions like the campaign against Freeman cause a buildup of resentment that eventually may (must?) lead to an explosion. The Lobby is contributing to a growth in anti-Semitism — indeed, to some extent it is creating anti-Semitism. The consequence of this, I fear, will be violent. There is a terrible paradox here. While in the past an innocent population was victimized by purveyors of the Great Lie, today it is the potential victims who are telling lies — lies that imperil their own cause, and more.
Michael Polan
March 11, 2009 @ 8:25 am
I have always been surprized at the power of this lobby, this personal attack is fueled by an American citizen who has committed treason against his own government by leaking information to Israel. I admire Mr Freeman’s clear and straightforward defense of his character and am saddened that such an articulate and decent man should not be able to advise his government in this difficult time
Carroll
March 11, 2009 @ 11:47 am
Every time Israel goes unpunished for it’s agressions and every time the US zionist are successful in preventing people like Freeman and Zinni from representing US interest they become bolder and bolder in their madness.
I use to think that surely the majority of congress would come to it’s senses and do something about this subverting of US government by the foreign interest of US zionist…then I thought perhaps Obama would bring some balance to this issue ….but I no longer have any expectation of that happening.
I don’t think it is alarmist to say that the US zionist and the Jewish Lobby will destroy America…they have already destroyed our government…..it can’t end any other way now.
@Jon..
“The second issue I find even more disturbing. Actions like the campaign against Freeman cause a buildup of resentment that eventually may (must?) lead to an explosion. The Lobby is contributing to a growth in anti-Semitism — indeed, to some extent it is creating anti-Semitism. The consequence of this, I fear, will be violent. There is a terrible paradox here. While in the past an innocent population was victimized by purveyors of the Great Lie, today it is the potential victims who are telling lies — lies that imperil their own cause, and more.”
I have a problem with characterizing the current resentment of (some) Jews as anti-semitism. The majority of the resentment out in the public is justifed and deserved. For 60 years the Jews themselves have created and at the very least let their communities and leaders create the image that Jews=Israel.
We Americans ( and the world) have been told for decades by Jews themselves that Jews=Israel, it’s not something we thought up ourselves.
So let’s not use ‘anti semitism” to describe what is happening even when saying they or Israel are creating it themselves. It wouldn’t matter if they are Jews, Buddhist or Methodist or the Cuban Exile cabal or mixed ethnic Communist or German Nazis undermining America, the resentment of them and what they are doing would be the same.
Using anti semitism to describe the general disgust over their tactics and agenda is the same as their using anti semitism to smear critics and deflect criticism of what they are in reality, actually doing,have been doing before our very eyes…and it just doesn’t wash as an excuse or defense any longer.
We need to start being very clear and precise about exactly what this is.
Jon Harrison
March 11, 2009 @ 2:58 pm
I agree with you, Carroll. You misunderstood my point, or perhaps I should say I was unclear. I myself am very critical of Israel and even more so of the Israel Lobby here in the U.S. But I certainly did not mean that I or anyone else who feels as I do is anti-semitic. What I meant to convey is that some people can be pushed over the line into outright anti-semitism by the actions of Israel/the Lobby. And that anti-semites can more easily fan the flames of hate when Israel and Jews here in the States heap fuel on the fire.
Abbas Khalil
March 11, 2009 @ 3:42 pm
Jim, as much as I was disgusted at the turn of events, it should really come as no surprise to anyone looking at the formation of the Obama regime. It looks as though America ceased to produce a qualified, independent and fair-minded individuals who can assume a forward position to serve the interest of this country and this country alone. I can’t help but feel bemused at the sheer stranglehold this tiny entity called Israel (who won’t even exist without the handouts American taxpayers send their way!) has on this great nation.
But I find this to be a blessing in disguise for am sure people who care for America and its history won’t be silent. It has to start somewhere and that place is the Congress. The people of America need to stop this onslaught on their democracy by this foreign country.
Let’s also not forget that this will not sit very well with Mr. Blair who himself chose Chas Freeman for this sensitive position.
Abe Bird
March 11, 2009 @ 5:08 pm
Why can’t the Israeli Lobby have its say when the Pro-Saudi and Pro-Chinese Lobbies approved and pushed Chas W. Freeman Jr. for that sensitive mission?
I’m glad for the American people that Freeman is a free man now and set down off the mission. Something good happened in America then !!!!
The Israeli Lobby doesn’t place Israelâs interests before those of the United States but care first to US interests by backing Israel as one of the best assets that the US has in the world.
Jews is not Israel, but Israel is the national state and homeland of Jews. You may have some FinkleSatans and Yehudi Menothings that oppose Israel right to defend herself but they are very small and tiny lunatics. The vast majority of the Jews feels and thinks that Zionism is returning of the Jews to their home, an idea that is being supported by tens of millions all over the world.
Jon Harrison
March 11, 2009 @ 6:35 pm
I can’t agree with Abbas Khalil’s view that people who care about America won’t be silent — or rather, that this will make any difference. The pro-Israel mantra in the American media is overwhelming. I mean, come on, the Israelis deliberately killed 34 Americans on the U.S.S. Liberty back in 1967, and to this day the issue remains muted; 9 out of 10 Americans don’t even know the incident occurred.
I see no end to the current state of affairs until America as a whole is really affected by events in the Middle East. If we ever reach a point where American soldiers are clearly seen to be fighting and dying for Israel, then perhaps public opinion will turn. Barring that, I see the Lobby and its allies in Congress and the media carrying the day into the indefinite future.
Hal O'Leary
March 11, 2009 @ 10:11 pm
I find it difficult to buy Freemans argument that the NIC could not function effectively with his commitment to ‘tell it like it is’. Is he suggesting that the NIC would be better served by one who would not?
I would think that if he has concerns for his country, he would use this opportunity to fight for his appointment and force Obama to take sides. This would let those of us who also have great concerns about our future as a democracy to have a clearer idea of just where our President stands when it comes to our policies in the Middle East.
While I’m at it, I would like to ask Jim Lobe if he would now agree with me that we are indeed living under fascism, at least in accordance with Musolini’s definition.
Abbas Khalil
March 11, 2009 @ 11:36 pm
Hal, Have you read the whole letter?! It is very obvious that Chas was alluding to the fact that the Israeli lobby wants a person who would doctor any document to fit their warmongering agenda (better yet, “let-America-fight-our-wars”); in essence, a biased document!
Have you wondered why the Israelis were flabbergasted when the NIC document of 2006 found that Iran actually ceased its nuclear weapons program in 2003 (and in effect rendered any motive for a military confrontation as a non-starter)!!?
Rufus D'Souza
March 12, 2009 @ 1:17 am
It was heartening to read the of Mr Freemans most of the comments of Mr.
Freeman’s statement. And I most readily agree with Hal O’Leary’s view that Mr. Freeman should have stayed put and forced President Obama to take sides.
Ali
March 12, 2009 @ 4:31 am
As John Mearsheimer correctly said: “Obama is no match for Israeli Lobby.” That will be his decisive challenge. The Lobby’s boys are allover his head, ears, nose, and……………
CM
March 12, 2009 @ 2:48 pm
At least in this instance we can identify the one politician, Senator Schumer, who most volubly demonstrated against Freeman’s chairmanship. Our outrage seems more usefully directed at our leaders when they fail to act with political courage and in the interest of the
country they serve (and arguably, in the interest of Israel itself), rather than at an omnipresent yet nebulous Lobby.
Who are the individuals, and how can political pressure be applied on them?
And yes, misdirecting outrage, coupled with a sense of futility, breeds madness in a society.
Carroll
March 12, 2009 @ 11:38 pm
@Jon
Jon Harrison Says:
March 11th, 2009 at 2:58 pm
I agree ’some’ anti semites would use it. But in reality real anti semites are few and far between. Because we see the hysterica and accusations of ‘anti semitism’ all the time from the Jewish zionist activist it gives the false impression there is one behind every tree and under bed..and that’s the impression they want to give.
If anti semitism existed at the level they claim they would all be long gone from the US.
Jon Harrison Says:
March 11th, 2009 at 6:35 pm
I also agree with you in the above post. With the note that every American would be furious about the US-Isr ponzi scheme ‘IF’ they knew…but the press does a fine job of keeping the average Joe ignorant on this issue.
I also agree that it will take a moumental and damaging event to shake Israel and the US zionist out of the US…..but I am confident that Israel and it’s minons will create just such an event.
The scorpion always stings the frog that carries it. It’s just a matter of time.
Jon Harrison
March 15, 2009 @ 6:39 pm
Carroll, I would only dispute you on one point. I think there are plenty of anti-semites in the U.S., however, they are for most part people who possess no power or influence. It is simply not “respectable” to be anti-semitic, just as it’s declasse to be a racist. But there are plenty of “average Americans” who dislike Jews, just as there are plenty of white racists still around. Neither advertises — that’s the difference between today 50 or 75 years ago.
Another thing that keeps anti-semitism in check is the philo-semitism of the religious right, believing as they do that the reestablishment of Israel is the necessary precursor to J.C.’s return. Whether that may change with time remains to be seen. But I digress . . .
I do agree that the Israelis and AIPAC et. al. cry anti-semitism just about any time anyone criticises Israel or its supporters. Heck, it’s happened to me. The fact that hardly anyone of influence calls them on that is the big problem we face, no question. I simply raised the point about anti-semitism because it does exist, and it could get a lot worse. That doesn’t lessen my opposition to Israeli policies and the undue influence of the Lobby one iota.
AbeBird
March 16, 2009 @ 4:02 am
Jon Harrison ;
Repeating the U.S.S. Liberty conspiracies won’t help you basing your notion is solid ground , http://pnews.org/art/ussliberty.shtml .
The US interest is not laid on totalitarian entities !!!!
It is NOT Israel, it’s the future of America integrity and well function regime!
Sure the United States and Israel should have a normal relationship, one similar to US relations with other democracies, and lets not have the US pushing it’s nose into the Israeli – Palestinian problem as the US doesn’t push its nose into the Tibetaian crisis, for example.
Freeman not only has extremist views regarding the Middle East and China, but he has been beholden to lobby groups that are anxious to influence intelligent assessments regarding Saudi Arabia and China. Freeman bowed out when it became clear that his highly questionable financial ties to the Saudi and China lobby would be deeply probed by inspectors general, congressional staffers and the media. He couldn’t handle the truth about his financial ties to these lobbies which do not serve the interests of the United States. The heavy thumbs of the powerful Saudi and Chinese lobbies would have subtly, and perhaps invisibly, weighed on Freeman’s intelligence assessment.
The truth is that the Freeman appointment was bad for America, bad for peace in the Middle East, bad for human rights in China, bad for Tibet, bad for the environment, and bad for “policy-neutral intelligence.” Those who challenged it performed a patriotic duty. They should be praised for helping the Obama administration avoid a serious blunder that threatened to compromise the president’s ability to act in the interest of the United States on the basis of policy-neutral intelligence. All Americans owe them a debt of gratitude.
Jon Harrison
March 16, 2009 @ 10:11 pm
AbeBird: I mentioned the Liberty in passing, it doesn’t form the “basis” for any of my “notions”.
On the Liberty read Bamford’s “Body of Secrets” pp. 187-239, by far the best published account. It’s based on the still classified NSA documentation of the attack, to which Bamford had access. Mentioning the Liberty never fails to arouse Israel’s partisans, I presume because they know how bad it looks when an “ally” can be shown to have murdered its patron’s citizens.
Simply by being Israel’s friend and enabler, we are pushing our nose into the Israeli-Palestinian “problem.” I think we should get our nose completely out of that business — by cutting off economic and military aid to all the nations in the area, especially Israel.
Your post enlightens us on one thing: your pro-Israel bias. I too am biased: I’m pro-American first, last and always. What happens to Arabs and Israelis is no proper business of ours. Every American life lost and every penny spent on the troubles of these utterly foreign, ever-quarreling peoples is a tragedy and a waste.