Monday morning marks the formal opening of the annual three-day policy conference of the American-Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) which, according to AIPAC’s press announcement of the event, is “consistently ranked as the most influential foreign policy lobbying organization on Capitol Hill.” You can expect a strong focus on Iran and a very hawkish line towards same. The press release makes the point that “ALL three remaining Presidential candidates, ALL four leaders of Congress… AS WELL AS Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice and Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert will address the conference. (Emphasis in the original.) So much for the argument that AIPAC really isn’t as powerful as its critics, like Stephen Walt and John Mearsheimer, claim.
While all major Jewish organizations, including the more peace-oriented ones like Americans for Peace Now and the Israeli Policy Forum, are represented on AIPAC’s board, the actual line-up of speakers, particularly in the “breakout sessions” on specific issues, is very narrow, ranging (in Israeli terms) from the far right (as in pro-settler), to the center-right governing Kadima Party. Thus, it’s notable that the highest-ranking Labor Party member (as listed in the program) is former deputy defense minister Ephraim Sneh, who actually resigned from the Labor Party last week to form his own group that is expected to soon join Kadima. Sneh, it should be noted, strongly favors concessions for the Palestinian Authority led by Abu Mazen, but he is strongly anti-Hamas and considers Iran an existential threat. The U.S. spectrum is also remarkably narrow; on the “left” are former Clinton officials Daniel Benjamin (speaking on how to reach “moderate Muslims” on a panel that includes two serious extremists, Martin Kramer of the Adelson Institute at the Shalem Center, and Walid Phares, the former Phalangist who is now based at the Foundation for Defense of Democracies, or FDD) and that perennial, Dennis Ross. Ross will be speaking along with Sneh, Liz Cheney(!), and Foreign Affairs Committee Chairman Howard Berman (who could have some interesting things to say) in the opening plenary session after an introductory speech by Sen. John McCain. Those in the U.S. Jewish community who favor some form of engagement — direct or indirect — with Hamas, Hezbollah, Syria, or Iran will simply not be represented on the podium and will have to satisfy themselves, I suppose, with asking questions from the floor.
Much attention, as in the past several years, will be devoted to Iran, which dominates the list of lobbying priorities (“taking action”) cited on AIPAC’s home page. A panel on financial sanctions against Iran will be monopolized by individuals who strongly favor them; same with another panel on divestment; and a third panel on “what does Iran really want?” will feature two Iran hawks, Ilan Berman of the American Foreign Policy Council, and Patrick Clawson of the Washington Institute for Near East Policy (WINEP), as well as a former adviser to the Israeli prime minister (although I don’t know which one). This group believes a lot more in sticks than in carrots.
The session on Syria looks to be even more hawkish. In addition to New York Rep. Eliot Engel, presenters include Tony Badran, a regime-changer at FDD, and WINEP’s David Schenker, who spent much of Bush’s first term in Donald Rumsfeld’s office working with Elliot Abrams at the White House and Scooter Libby in Cheney’s office on ways to destabilize and/or attack Syria. The panel on Hamas and Hezbollah doesn’t look much better. Entitled “Double Trouble,” the presenters include an AIPAC official, Leah Odinec; Avi Jorisch, who used to be with FDD and now heads something called the Illicit Finance Group; and Bret Stephens, the pro-settler foreign affairs columnist at the Wall Street Journal.
Another panel, “Shifting Sands: The Changing Landscape of Today’s MIddle East,” is also dominated by hawks or, as described by the program, “three of America’s most renowned foreign policy experts.” They include former U.S. Amb. and to Morocco and bona fide FOB, Marc Ginsberg, who until recently was on FDD’s board of advisers; Danielle Pletka of the American Enterprise Institute (AEI), and WINEP’s executive director, Robert Satloff. Ginsberg will also be appearing opposite (if that’s the correct word) Bill Kristol on a panel entitled “The Presidential Situation Room: How Candidates Develop Their Foreign Policy.” Ginsberg is a frequent contributor to Kristol’s Weekly Standard.
For Islamophobes, “Terror in Our Backyard: The Reach of Radicals Operating in America” should be a big attraction. Steve Emerson of the Investigative Project and Jonathan Schanzer of the Jewish Policy Forum, a group whose board of directors includes Daniel Pipes and Michael Ledeen, will be the sole presenters.
Likud Party leader Binyamin Netanyahu will also be presenting in plenary session of course. I’m betting we’re going to hear about how this is 1938, and Iran is Nazi Germany.
Sens. Clinton and Obama will open the final session Wednesday. It will be very interesting if Obama, in particular, restates before this crowd his remarks about the distinction between being ”pro-Israel” and being “pro-Likud,” or his sympathy for Palestinian suffering, or his belief that expanding settlements is not conducive to peace. The Israeli government’s decision to build nearly 900 new housing units in East Jerusalem this weekend certainly highlights the issue.
As of late morning, however, more than 5,000 anticipated AIPAC delegates will be let loose on Capitol Hill to tell their elected representatives about what they’ve learned in the previous two days, and engaging Israel’s enemies is not likely to be one of the lessons they’ll take with them.
Beth George
June 2, 2008 @ 8:35 am
Dear sir, Dr Walid Phares as you mentioned was not Phalangist. Rather he was the head of a Social-Democratic intellectuals movement in Beirut. His first book, Pluralism in Lebanon was published in 1979. He was the advisor of the Union of Lebanese Workers inthe 1980s, and published many books before he emigrated in 1990. Just to make sure you understand, he was abducted by the Phalangists on June 30, 1983 because he opposed them. On the other hand, there is an attorney by the same name in Arabic -apelled Walid Faris, or fares, who is the deputy secretary general of the Phalange Party (Kataeb) in Lebanon today. You can check that online. http://www.bachirgemayel.org/forum/showthread.php?p=8219.
Now, you may not agree with Walid Phares, the author or Professor, but one has be accurate in describing past affiliations.
Ari Goldberg
June 2, 2008 @ 10:02 am
I hope you don’t believe that AIPAC is the most influential foreign policy lobbying organization on Capitol Hill. How about an organization that not only influences foreign policy – it makes it? I’m talking about the Council on Foreign Relations. A majority of all key cabinet positions, presidents, Congressional leaders, media moguls, etc. are members. And in case you think AIPAC controls them, remember the CFR, according to Carroll Quigley, is a front group for a secret society founded by Cecil Rhodes. Therefore, if any group controls US foreign policy, it is the Anglo-American Establishment, not the American Jewish community.
Steve
June 2, 2008 @ 1:03 pm
AIPAC is an extremist organization. It promotes the primitive and violent agenda of Israel’s Likud party. It is not an “Israel Lobby,” but a “Likud Lobby.” It’s time for all those who love America and Israel to comdemn AIPAC for promoting policies that harm both America and Israel.
Steve
June 2, 2008 @ 2:28 pm
Ari Goldberg doubts the power of AIPAC. In fact abundant evidence demonstrates that AIPAC is among the strongest lobbies in Washington. For starters, see three studies of the reslative power of Washington lobbies, published in Fortune Magazine on Dec. 8, 1997, in Fortune on May 28. 2001, and in National Journal on March 5, 2005. The 1997 Fortune study found that AIPAC ranked second in power among all national lobbies, trailing only the AARP, and ahead of the AFL-CIO, the National Association of Manufacturers, and the National Rifle Association. The 2001 Fortune study ranked AIPAC fourth in power among national lobbies, and the 2005 National Journal study found AIPAC tied for second (with the AARP) and trailing only the NRA. In contrast the Council on Foreign Relations didn’t make the list of the top 25 lobbies in any of these studies. The charge that the Council runs US foreign policy is full-moon stuff.
MM
June 2, 2008 @ 7:50 pm
Well can anyone argue that genocide of Muslims in places like Iraq, Iran, and Palestine isn’t a good, sane, forward-looking American foreign policy?
Didn’t 9/11 change everything? Didn’t it officially enshrine zionism as the state religion?
420
June 3, 2008 @ 1:19 am
“Insanity is doing the same thing, over and over again, but expecting different results.” -Rita Mae Brown
Just how thick if the historical amnesia in the U.S.A.? AIPAC has taken us down this road twice already in the last 7 years, leading to two costly occupations in Afghanistan and Iraq. Now it’s recycling the same hysteria pointing the finger at Iran. It’s deja vu all over again. Why doesn’t Israel fight its own wars, instead of making enemies and picking fights in the Middle East, and expecting the U.S.A. to fight its battles? Better still, it’s high time to end all U.S. financial aid to this parasite of a country, until it gives up its nuclear weapons.
A nuclear-free Middle East is in everyone’s best interest. Time to get serious about making that a reality.
GV
June 3, 2008 @ 3:11 am
Senators Clinton and Obama will also attend? My guess is that must have something to do with the Presidential elections. Surely it can be only the complimentary political advice they would be getting from rich and influential people. Anything else? I would not dare to hint.
billct
June 3, 2008 @ 4:25 am
8 Then a new king, who did not know about Joseph, came to power in Egypt. 9 “Look,” he said to his people, “the Israelites have become much too numerous for us. 10 Come, we must deal shrewdly with them or they will become even more numerous and, if war breaks out, will join our enemies, fight against us and leave the country.”
sophia
June 3, 2008 @ 5:43 am
shalom, i would like to see obama addressed on his motives and his foriegn policy issues concerning us israel and his relationships with terroist and the people who are supporting him like the recent benoir who is 100 percent ani israel,if no progress comes from this meeting we can at least divulge wher the contenders for the us presidency standson relations concerning international trade , iran, iraq, the verbal threats from the ideological arminijad towards us israel and america, knowing hes cultivating nukes for this ideology,and how these contenders hope to strengthen there relations with us israel concerning what we are facing with terroist regimnes, the islamic republic of iran, and weapons imports falling in the wrong hands in the middle east and how the usa”s struggle in iraq and need for oil will effect us israel in the long run,topics also i would like to see is russia and china relations with islamic republic of iran and the building of foriegn alliances to name a few,toda, sophia
richard vajs
June 3, 2008 @ 7:36 am
Israel is a fundamentally unstable country – all of their political energy seem dedicated to plotting and scheming against every one of their neighbors, cheating their native Arabs out life and property, and spying and leaning hard on their only friends. Such habits are hard to break. I predict that the day all of their neighbors lie in bombed ruins and the last Palestinian is booted out will also be the start of some internal civil war.
Steve
June 3, 2008 @ 8:38 am
If a politician in Washington fails to make an appearance at these AIPAC conventions you can be sure he will answer for it soon after. The rate of attendance by members of congress is amazing. Of course, some of know controlles always hold their dupes in abject contempt and no goup is subjected to such disdain as are those controlled by AIPAC.
Skip
June 3, 2008 @ 9:12 am
When I recited the Pledge of Allegiance of grade school, my words included, “one nation.” That was the deal that I had with my country (the USA) and my country had with me. Today, the USA no longer exists, it has been replaced with the “US-Israel Empire.” Even though Israel has: attacked and killed Americans (the attack on the USS Liberty), has repeatedly spied on the US, has sold sensitive US technology to countries that the US considers a potential threat, refused to recognize basic extradition with the US (the Sheinbien case), there is UNCONDITIONAL US support for Israel. Furthermore, Israeli officials are frequently allowed full access into the deepest and most secure reaches of the Pentagon. Any US Politician who dares to question US support for Israel is isolated and admonished and their career is over. Our founding fathers would be turning in their graves if they knew what was happening. I loved the USA and it’s tragic to see that it has morphed into the “US-ISRAEL EMPIRE.”
James
June 3, 2008 @ 9:23 am
AIPAC cares MORE for Israel than America. And for this reason Americans should BEWARE!!!
GV
June 3, 2008 @ 9:29 am
richard vajs, I disagree. Citizens of Israel are mostly realists who deal with issues as they arise. Israelites living in US are the ones paying top dollar to accomplish the grand plans. But they also get fat deals from the administration. The taxpayer has no say.
JOHN
June 3, 2008 @ 9:55 am
A PASSIONATE ATTACHMENT OF ONE NATION FOR ANOTHER PRODUCES A VARIETY OF EVILS.GEORGE WASHINTON HIS LAST SPEECH.I BELIEVE THE MESS IN THE MIDDLE EAST IS CAUSED BY SUCH ATTACHMENT WITH THE STATE OF ISRAEL!
Tom
June 3, 2008 @ 12:39 pm
I just finished reading the national best-seller “The Israel Lobby and U.S. Foreign Policy”. It was published in 2007 and written by two Jewish American university professors. It is not anti-Semetic but it does make the case that the Israel Lobby has not served the best interests of America or Israel. Before readers shoot off a lot of opinions it might help to read this book. I got it at my county public library. It is coming out in paperback in September. It will probably update the activities of the Lobby and its hold on U.S. politicians through the primary campaign.
Steve
June 3, 2008 @ 2:27 pm
Tom is right, LobLogians should read Mearsheimer and Walt, The Israel Lobby. It is the best book yet to appear on the Israel lobby. Some of its claims and arguments can be debated, but the main claims of the book–that the Israel lobby is powerful, is Likudist, and is harming U.S. and Israeli interest–are persuasively made. FYI the authors are not Jewish, but they are fairminded. They believe the U.S. should fight to defend Israel if its survival is ever in jeopardy. What they oppose are Israeli expansion, and Likudist efforts to enmesh the U.S. in unwise mideast wars. Their book should be debated on LobeLog. Does anyone have further comment on it?
Kim
June 3, 2008 @ 3:13 pm
AIPAC members should offer up their own children to uniform up and fight, bleed and die for Israel.
Alan MacDonald
June 3, 2008 @ 8:01 pm
AIPAC does not represent the vast majority of anti-war Jews in the US or Israel.
AIPAC really stands for American-style Imperialism Political Action Committee.
AIPAC and the ‘corporatist Empire’ that rules America behind this two-party facade of ‘Vichy’ government and ‘vichy’ corporatist media push the candidates toward further destructive imperialist wars abroad and tyranny at home in each country.
As Hannah Arendt presciently warned of the Nazi Empire, “Empire abroad (always) entails tyranny at home.”
H Nensey
June 3, 2008 @ 11:27 pm
I strongly believe that all those who love and support Israel should pick up thier belongings and move to Israel. If you want to live in America you should love America and only America. Do not make my country (The US of A) fight, bleed and bankcrupt for the sake of Israel.
Steve
June 4, 2008 @ 12:43 am
Alan MacDonald is right, AIPAC does not represent most American Jews. Most in the U.S. Jewish community favor a just two-state solution to the Israel-Palestinian conflict, if the Palestinians will agree to it. In contrast AIPAC has worked to prevent such a solution. The time is long past for the decent majority of the American Jewish community to push AIPAC aside and replace it with new leadership that represents the peaceful will of the American Jewish majority. I think the best way to do this is to build up the new J Street organization to compete toe-to-toe with AIPAC. Every effort should be made to ensure that J Street succeeds. It is our best hope to push AIPAC to the margins where it belongs.
Tutu Ghosh
June 6, 2008 @ 6:52 am
Though depressing to contemplate, it is better to wake up to the reality of leadership elections. The competing candidates do not ask themselves, what is “right” and what is “wrong”; the question they ask instead is what will get me most votes? This is the l0ogic behind the Nixon administration’s withdrawal of its recognition of Taiwan as the Chinese representation in the international for a. This is the reason for Hillary Clinton’s support behind the invasion of Iraq; this is the logic behind McCain’s and Obama’s support of AIPAC. Some Obama supporters may be feeling a bit let down by their chosen Messiah; but what did they expect? He is running to be the President of the United States, isn’t he?